It’s an interesting question, and if you answer it glibly with “a woman who fucks for money” you’re missing the point… all wimminz fuck for money, or something that can be exchanged for money.
I have known wimminz who prided themselves on being sluts, because, in their own words, sluts don’t charge… fair enough as far as it goes, which isn’t very far when you get down to it, because sluts don’t fuck for free either, there is always some sort of cost, even if it is intangible at first.
Loyalty… now here is an interesting way to look at it, a whore has precisely 0.00 loyalty, it’s all about the money honey, and you can have as much of her time as you want, provided the meter keeps running, and nobody makes a higher offer.
A whore’s loyalty is like the cafe’s loyalty, as long as I give them money, they will give me coffee, but, they will give coffee to anyone with money, and even if I am not there, they are still selling coffee to others, coffee that I could drink.
About now some slut gangbang girl will come along and point out that a woman can in theory at least take as much cock and cum as a hundred guys can dish out, so why should she go without just to please someone who cannot satisfy all her possible needs.
Well, bitch, I’ll answer that question the day the cafe asks me for *all* my fucking money, so I can have the same amount of coffee I drink there today…
So, the whore has precisely 0.00 loyalty, what of the slut?
Does she have more? Possibly, in the sense that the cactus has more water content than the desert around it, but you still won’t be growing any potatoes in that soil.
What else can we say about the whore, well, unlike the wife, there is no future lost income if the guy who fucks her thinks it was a crap fuck, within the limits of the size of the market, she can always get other customers, but of job security there is none.
But back of all of this it keeps coming back to that loyalty thing, and it is the total and complete absence of any kind of loyalty that has always lain behind the negative connotations of the whore.
Lots of people can be bought, or bought off, so it is not purely that, but it is that the whore can only ever be rented, never bought, and it is purely that.
I have elsewhere on here a graphic that says “All women are filthy lying whores”, and it isn’t really talking about the old adage that even the wife is getting paid for it, but it is really talking about the fact that even the wife has zero loyalty, and that’s the crux of it… not the money.
However, much like a 10 year old street thug in Cali, there is a certain rustic charm and dignity in it, I got no loyalty mister, but you can hire me for an hour and I’ll call you El Presidente if you like.
This places them, on the moral scale, above those who also have no loyalty, but masquerade as someone who does, and I pledge thee my troth.
The whore has 0.00 loyalty, but greater than 0.00 honesty about what they are.
Again, this is invariably trotted out as a reason why whores aren’t that bad, hey, they are more honest than my ex wife… yadda yadda…
Again, it’s not actually true, *while* you are paying her, a whore will tell you exactly what you want to hear, oooh baby, you’re so goood at this…
So you only get the honesty when you ain’t paying, and want a freebie…
It’s not the exchange of money.
It’s not the honesty or lack of.
It always always always comes back to the loyalty, of which whores have 0.00.
Now, at the risk of invoking Dawkins, just because I say something truthful and derogatory about one class of people, that doesn’t mean that all that exists, in that universe or this one, is that single truthful and derogatory comment.
Nor does said universe comprise solely of the single truthful-ish but utterly misleading statement that a slut doesn’t charge, so that makes her better than a whore.
If the slut has 0.00 loyalty, then she is just a whore who doesn’t charge.
If the slut has greater than 0.00 loyalty (on a scale where 9.99 is absolute, we are talking 0.2 at best when we say greater than) then for all *practical* purposes she is still a whore that doesn’t charge
And this is just two words, slut and whore, there are hundreds of others.
It gets confusing, until you realise that back in the day or patriarchy and marriage 1.0, there were just two categories, you had wimminz who were pledged to one man, and wimminz who had sampled several cocks, the village whore might not actually have charged, but she was still the village whore.
So Julie knows she is really a whore, but doesn’t like that and all the connotations, so she isn’t a whore, she is a slut.
Meanwhile Jackie knows she isn’t really a whore, but she isn’t a slut like that Julie, so she is Feisty, and the beat goes on, and before you know it, the “wife” is the minority, there is the “wife” here, and over there 999 different varieties of “not wife”.
Calling Jackie a slut upsets her just as much as calling Julie a whore, it’s a veritable minefield, if you give a fuck about such things…
Whores of course have cunts, but sluts and feisty skanks and unicorns and ponies and everyone else female has pussies, another veritable minefield, if you give a fuck about such things.
So what is a whore? A whore is a wimminz with 0.00 loyalty and some honesty, provided you aren’t paying them.
Everything else that isn’t a now extinct wife 1.0 is a wimminz with 0.00 loyalty and 0.00 honesty, whether you pay them in cash or in other more existential ways…. give it any label you want, skank, slag, slug, tramp, etc
Maybe that “All women are filthy lying whores” ain’t so wide of the mark after all, and again, as I have said before here, always use the word cunt, never anything else.
Wife 1.0 might have had a “pussy” or some other sentimental nickname, everything else has a cunt.
Whores have cunts, so if all wimminz are filthy lying whores, then all wimminz have cunts too…. QED.
Of course, calling a wimminz who does not self-identify as a whore a whore, or referring to her cunt as a cunt, is not generally likely to get you access to said cunt, sure, there are exceptions, but not generally, and the more this upsets them, the more of that dishonesty they are likely to have, so it’s a good litmus test.
Living in de Nile, that’s what they are, talked about that before too.
So are you, if you have any ideas about slurping out some whore’s well used cunt, no, your feisty girlfriend who you are both being monogamous with each other, she has a pussy, so you’ll eat that…. ugh.
For “Jack”, who has been pursuing this wimminz on OKC, and who was falling for it all.
For “Jack”, who came over to my place, used my PC for a bit and asked me, when he right clicked on an image in Firefox, what the fuck this “search image on Tineye” is.
For “Jack”, who, when I told him, brought up his new girlfriend’s page on OKC, and started right clicking and searching on Tineye.
For “Jack”, who found her as a result of this on a swinging / fucking site, completely different profile to the OKC one of course.
For “Jack”, who went through the rest of her images on the swinging / fucking site, and found her as a result on an escort site.
For “Jack”, who walked in my door all loved up, NAWALT, and who walked out calling her a fucking whore, but struggled, looking for a more powerful word…. dude, there isn’t one, whore is plenty good enough.
Did she charge you? I asked him… god no, he says, mind you, I suppose I paid, bought drinks and dinner and shit, hey man, I said, you got the discounted deal, but the discount was countered by the greater level of lies and deception.